Supreme Court rejects appeal under NC racial bias law

  • Supreme Court rejects appeal under NC racial bias law

Supreme Court rejects appeal under NC racial bias law

The Obama administration's DOJ appealed the ruling, after which a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans upheld Hanen's injunction on November 9, 2015.

The Supreme Court has been without its standard nine members since Justice Antonin Scalia died in February.

"In a city of self-inflicted wounds, this one is more unsafe and less defensible than most", Obama wrote of the vacancy in a Huffington Post op-ed".

The Republican-led Senate, in a move with little precedent in US history, has refused to consider Obama's nominee to replace Scalia, federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland, saying Obama's successor should make the appointment. The court also rejected hundreds of appeals that had accumulated over the summer.

Juan Martinez is fighting the September 29 admonition by the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona that recommended he be placed on probation for one year, The Arizona Republic reported ( ).

Significance: Like Buck, this case is fundamentally about racial bias in determinations of guilt and punishment-and whether courts must address the issue of bias even in the face of procedural obstacles.

Voters next month will effectively decide the court's ideological bent for the next four years and possibly much longer. But as a tie vote, it did not set a precedent. If Hillary Clinton wins and Democrats take back control of the Senate after January, Senate leaders may move Garland's nomination forward in the lame duck session after the election.

In the unanimous ruling, the Oklahoma Supreme Court said the law, which was signed by Gov. Mary Fallin in June, would violate the Oklahoma constitution because laws can only deal with one subject. However, to say that Roe v. Wade hangs in the balance at this point in time is not at all an exaggeration. "No, it's absolutely not". In these cases, challengers are asking the Court to hold that use of a fixed racial quota to over-pack minorities into certain districts - diluting their influence in other districts - violates the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the trademark case of The Slants, a Portland-based Asian-American rock band that was denied a trademark for its band name for years on the ground that it disparaged Asians.

Aid to church schools: Is it unconstitutional to exclude a church school from taking advantage of a state program that provides recycled crushed tires for playgrounds?

She added: "While this case is clearly of extreme importance to the Redskins, and perhaps some of their fans, it is likely not of such importance to the public at large". A trial court later ruled that he was intellectually disabled and thus ineligible for the death penalty.

The law was first introduced in 2015, while anti-abortion legislators across the USA introduced laws which came to be known as Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers, or "TRAP", laws. Imagine if one of them leaves the Court during this next president's term. Decisions in these cases could have far-ranging repercussions for the progress and promise of our justice system as well as our nation's founding principles.

Missing some content? Care to comment?